If you want to change the look of your photographs by enhancing or removing blemishes on the photo, Zerene Stacker photo editing software has a simple and easy-to-use feature. This incredible power is really only accessible, if you have a good PC, and the right graphics driver installed. One of the most impressive features of the software is that it allows you to work with any aspect of the image, be it the background or the foreground. Finally, the built in Shape map tool allows you to map unique patterns to selected images. automatically according to the dimensions of the selected image. Another useful feature is its AutoShape tool which allows you to automatically adjust shapes such as text, rectangles, circle, etc. One of the most popular features of the software is the fact that it includes libraries that allow you to organize your digital images easily. One of the highlights for me is the fact that Helicon Focus is relatively easy to use and one of the best value for money features on the market today. The software also includes powerful photo effects, including Highlights, Splashes, Dribbble, Brighter, and Noise reduction. When you look at the side-by-side 100% crops remember that the PA super res image was generated from four HANDHELD samples.Helicon Focus package comes with an exclusive user interface, which allows the user to adjust various aspects of photos, such as exposure, color, red eye, and background. Nevertheless, I think the result was quite acceptable and the equal to the HiRes sample provided by mpgxsvcd. I ended up using only four images (the bare minimum recommended by PA). However, because it doesn't AF on the EM5-I, it makes for a real challenge to produce a handheld sequence of images that are all well focused. The Tamron 90mm + speedbooster makes for an excellent close-up combo. So, with all that in mind today I did a new test, this time using a Tamron 90mm macro lens (Nikon mount) plus the Metabones speedbooster mounted to my EM5-I. I don't think I made a particularly good choice with last week's test. When there isn't one for your specific lens/body combo, you have to hunt around and find an alternative that does reasonably well. In PA you have to select a specific profile to apply before you can run the tool to process a super resolution image and different profiles can have a visually obvious effect on the output. The second issue is that the PA doesn't have a profile for the 75mm+EM5 combination. Shooting the $20 bill required me to focus the 75mm at its absolute minimum distance and even then the bill didn't fully fill the frame. While it's a fantastically sharp lens, I don't think its strength and resolution sweet spot is close-ups. However, I wasn't particularly satisfied with that quick test for a couple of reasons. I concluded then that the PA result wasn't quite as good at the microdetail level. Last week I did a quick PA stack with the 75mm Oly and posted my comparison here. However, mpgxsvcd in this thread posted a well-done full-sized HiRes shot and since it's a shot of US currency, it sets up the possibility of doing a comparison. Unfortunately, I don't have an EM5-II to do side-by-side comparisons. As a PhotoAcute user I have a fair amount of experience with that tool on the EM5-I. Most of the posts are of a speculative nature based on incomplete information about the two techniques. super resolution shots produced by PhotoAcute. In a number of recent threads lots of people are speculating about the relative strengths and weaknesses of HiRes shots produced by the EM5-II vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |